For centuries, we have looked to the physical appearance of celebrities to determine what is considered beautiful. Celebrities like Doris Day and Debbie Reynolds embodied post-war optimism. The 1960s counterculture focused on idealism and social protest. They often favored androgynous looks. Today, the punk look is often associated with disenchanted youth and the German cabarets of the 1930s. While it’s still considered beautiful, it’s an uncommon standard.
The value of beauty may be measured by the features of the object that has been considered beautiful or by the pleasure the object evokes in the experiencer. This distinction is often made because of differences in color perception. Plotinus’ definition of beauty is based on the idea that an object’s ‘formedness’ is an important factor. In other words, the object’s form and color may differ slightly from the person who views it.
There are several reasons why the standards of beauty are constantly evolving, but most people can agree that some women look more attractive than others. In fact, many people believe that being white and beautiful has a lot to do with class. For example, a person with a double chin is not seen as a desirable trait today. A woman with a double chin would not be valued as highly as a model with an unusual face shape. And Victorians considered rosebud lips as a quintessential beauty element.
Plato and Aristotle differ in their conceptions of beauty. Their conception of beauty consists of arranging and expressing different parts into a cohesive whole. In other words, a beautiful sculpture should be proportional and symmetrical. It is impossible to construct a beautiful object out of ugliness. However, the classical conception of beauty is based on the idea that symmetry and order are important elements in beauty. This concept of beauty is rooted in the classical tradition.